In part 1 of our “Team Check-ins” series, we explored why many team check-ins fail and how an async-first approach can potentially transform team communication. Now let's tackle the practical side: implementing check-ins that actually work, regardless of your team's setup.
I've spent years watching teams struggle with the same check-in challenges. The most common complaint being: "These feel like a waste of time." Let's change that notion.
It’s not “sync vs. async”
First, let's drop the false dichotomy. The question isn't "sync or async?" but rather "what information needs real-time discussion, and what's better served through documentation?"
Think of it as a communication spectrum: on one end, you have those magical synchronous moments when ideas flow effortlessly between people, creating solutions no one could have developed alone.
On the other, you have the clarity and accessibility of well-documented asynchronous updates that respect everyone's time and cognitive boundaries.
Great teams move fluidly along this spectrum, choosing the right approach for each situation rather than defaulting to whatever's most comfortable for the loudest voices.
Now with that out of the way, let’s build a step-by-step process on how to implement team check-ins that are actually useful, no matter how or where you work.
✽ Step 1: Make an honest assessment
Before adding another meeting or Slack channel to your already-crowded schedule, take stock:
- What's working in your current communication system?
- Where are things breaking down?
- When do people seem most engaged versus most distracted?
One engineering leader once told me: "We realized we were spending 3 hours weekly in status updates that could have been shared in 15 minutes of active reading. And we weren't spending any time on the complex integration issues that actually needed real-time problem-solving."
The solution isn't necessarily fewer meetings, but more intentional ones. It’s a different mindset.
✽ Step 2: Design your approach
Rethinking check-in content
If you've been following our standup series, you know the traditional "yesterday/today/blockers" format often devolves into lifeless status reports. The same problem plagues most check-ins, whether they're daily standups or weekly team meetings.
Instead of focusing on activities, shift toward outcomes and needs:
- Progress worth noting: Not everything deserves airtime. What's changed that others should know about?
- Upcoming inflection points: What decisions or milestones are approaching that might need input?
- Coordination needs: Where do you need others to adapt their work to align with yours?
- Unexpected discoveries: What have you learned that might change how the team approaches their work?
One product team I worked with added "What surprised you this week?" to their check-in template. This simple question surfaced assumptions and insights that would have otherwise remained hidden.
From templates to conversations
Templates can help structure thinking, but they shouldn't become robotic scripts. As we saw in the standup series, too, the most effective check-ins focus on moving toward shared goals rather than individual task lists.
Try framing your check-in around:
"How are we progressing toward [current objective], and what needs to shift?"
This automatically filters out the mundane and focuses attention on what matters.
Matching format to purpose
Different check-in formats serve different purposes:
🔝 For maintaining alignment: Brief asynchronous updates work well, allowing everyone to stay informed without interrupting deep work.
💭 For problem-solving: Synchronous discussions with the right people at the right time beat endless comment threads.
🤲 For relationship-building: Nothing replaces occasional face-to-face (or camera-to-camera) time for building the trust that powers everything else.
The key is matching the format to the actual need rather than defaulting to tradition, makes sense?
✽ Step 3: Make sure your implementation sticks
I've seen countless well-designed check-in systems fall apart within weeks. Here's how to avoid that fate:
Start with why (thanks Sinek!)
Everyone needs to understand what problem you're solving. Are check-ins addressing:
- Information gaps between teams?
- Coordination challenges across time zones?
- The need for more regular feedback?
Without clarity on the "why," people see check-ins as just another obligation – and they’d be right in those cases.
Evolve through experimentation
Rather than announcing "this is how we'll do check-ins forever," frame it as an experiment:
"We're trying this approach for the next three weeks to solve [specific problem]. Then we'll assess whether it's working and adjust."
This immediately reduces resistance and creates permission to evolve.
Leadership as “boundary management”
As part 3 of our standup series highlighted, transforming team communication practices requires skilled leadership at the boundary — connecting team needs with organizational realities.
This means:
- Modeling the behavior you want to see
- Protecting the team from external chaos that undermines new practices
- Making the business case for these changes to stakeholders
One Customer Success manager I worked with blocked 30~ minutes after our morning check-ins to handle any escalations that emerged.
This simple boundary management technique prevented check-ins from becoming hour-long problem-solving sessions while ensuring issues got addressed.
✽ Step 4: Review the human element
Check-ins aren't just information exchanges, they're human connection points. How you implement them sends powerful signals about your team culture.
Creating psychological safety
For check-ins to surface the truth (especially about challenges and blockers) people need to feel safe being vulnerable.
This requires leaders to:
- Acknowledge their own mistakes and uncertainties
- Respond constructively to problems
- Focus on solutions rather than blame
- Recognize honest disclosure as a strength, not a weakness
The check-in vs. check-up distinction
There's a world of difference between checking in with someone and checking up on them. One builds trust; the other erodes it.
Checking in asks: "What support do you need?" and "What are you learning?" Checking up demands: "Is this done yet?" and "Why isn't this finished?"
The language you use in these interactions shapes how people experience them. A simple tweak from "What's your status on X?" to "How's X progressing, and is there anything you need?" can start to transform the entire dynamic.
✽ Step 5: Use tools that enable rather than constrain
The tool landscape for team check-ins has exploded, but technology should serve your process, not define it.
When evaluating tools, ask yourself:
- Does this reduce friction in sharing information?
- Does it create visibility where it's needed?
- Does it integrate with our existing workflow?
- Does it respect focus time and cognitive boundaries?
The best tool is often the simplest one that gets the job done without requiring people to change how they work.
✽ Step 6: Analyze common patterns for different teams
While each team needs to find their own rhythm, certain patterns tend to work well in specific contexts:
For remote teams
Daily text-based check-ins with a synchronous video "huddle" 1-3 times weekly works well for many remote teams. The async updates keep information flowing, while the sync touchpoints maintain connection and address complex issues.
Remote teams especially benefit from explicit response protocols: "When someone posts a blocker in the check-in channel, the expectation is acknowledgment within 2 hours and either resolution or a path forward within 24 hours."
For hybrid teams
Hybrid environments create unique challenges, with information often flowing more easily among co-located team members.
Successful hybrid teams often use shared digital artifacts as the single source of truth, ensuring everyone has equal access to information regardless of location. Their check-ins focus on updating these artifacts rather than verbal updates that might not reach everyone.
For creative teams
Creative work often follows less predictable patterns than linear production. Rather than daily updates, many creative teams benefit from milestone-based check-ins that align with natural phases of the creative process.
One Content Design team I studied replaced daily standups with twice-weekly "critique sessions" focused on feedback and course correction. This better matched their workflow while still maintaining team alignment.
✽ Step 7: Measure what matters
Some time has happened since you implemented your team check-ins. How do you know if your check-ins are working? Well, look beyond surface-level compliance to these indicators:
- Are blockers being identified earlier and resolved faster?
- Is duplicate work decreasing?
- Do team members seem more aware of how their work connects to others?
- Is there less "surprise" when things ship or launch?
You will know your new check-in system is working when people start referencing things they learned from others' updates in their own work. Information will be actually flowing across the team, not just up to management.
Our basic check-ins are working, now what?
As your team matures, your check-in practices can evolve from simple status sharing to more sophisticated forms of alignment. You can start by:
Anticipating risks
Beyond reporting what's happened, advanced teams use check-ins to look ahead at potential risks and dependencies.
"What might prevent us from hitting our milestone, even if everything currently looks on track?"
This question surfaces the concerns people usually keep to themselves until problems actually materialize.
Integrating learnings
The most sophisticated teams use check-ins not just for status but for continuous learning integration.
"What have we learned this week that should change how we approach our work?"
This question can transform check-ins from backward-looking status reports to more forward-looking “adaptation sessions.”
Team communication as a competitive advantage
In a world where execution velocity often determines success, effective team communication isn't just a nice-to-have, but a competitive advantage.
The teams that thrive aren't those with the most meetings or the strictest processes. They're the ones who've mastered the art of sharing the right information with the right people at the right time in the right format.
Your check-in system should evolve as your team and work evolve. The principles remain constant: respect people's time and attention, focus on what matters, create psychological safety, and maintain the human connection that powers everything else.
Start small, experiment continuously, and remember that the goal isn't perfect adherence to a process but rather meaningful connection that drives results.
Next in our Team Check-ins Series: Part 3 will explore advanced check-in strategies for managing dependencies across multiple teams and complex organizations.
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
